- Decentralized Bitcoin ownership, like a rebellious teenager, simply refuses to be tamed by Wall Street; unlike gold, which sits obediently in banks and central vaults.
- On-chain data reveals that over 70% of BTC is hoarded by long-term holders, leaving the daily tradable supply as scarce as a well-behaved cat at a dog park.
- Negative funding rates mirror a defensive sentiment, as if the markets are waiting for a nod from their parents before making any moves, despite seemingly cleaner positioning.
Caitlin Long has boldly drawn a line in the proverbial sand between Bitcoin and gold, much like a child declaring their territory. The founder of Custodia Bank argues that Wall Street cannot dominate Bitcoin as it did with precious metals, hinging her argument on one crucial point: the nature of ownership.
According to Long, gold’s downfall stemmed from its centralized storage. Banks and central banks held this shiny metal hostage, making it a cinch for Wall Street to financialize. It’s like having your lunch money taken by a bully; you can’t fight back if it’s not in your pocket.
Bitcoin, however, plays by different rules. It doesn’t languish in institutional vaults, eagerly awaiting its fate at the hands of financial manipulators. It’s more like that friend who refuses to share their dessert-good luck getting your hands on it!
The Majority of Bitcoin is Hoarded Like a Treasure Chest
Long informs us that approximately 70% of Bitcoin remains locked away with long-term holders, akin to a group of squirrels hoarding acorns for winter. These holders aren’t selling or trading; they’re just sitting tight, making the available Bitcoin as rare as a sunny day in London.
Data from Glassnode and CoinGlass backs up this claim. As of February 2026, about 72% of Bitcoin qualifies as long-term held, defined as coins that have been unmoved for over 155 days. Talk about commitment!
This concentrated ownership curtails available liquidity. Wall Street can’t just waltz in and scoop up buckets of Bitcoin to control the market. In times of stress, there’s no floating supply available for institutional lifeboats.
WALL STREET WILL NEVER CONTROL BITCOIN 👀
Caitlin Long insists it won’t be financialized like gold-ownership is key!
Gold was always tucked away in banks & central banks. Bitcoin? Not so much.
She estimates roughly ~70% of it is held by long-term holders, not…
– CryptosRus (@CryptosR_Us)
Bitcoin’s Decentralized Nature: The Ultimate Fortress
Long passionately emphasized Bitcoin’s fundamental traits that guard against centralized control. The cryptocurrency operates on a voluntary, permissionless basis, much like a free-spirited artist refusing to conform to societal norms. Users can move Bitcoin far away from the traditional financial systems, as if escaping a dull dinner party.
Remarkably, the network can function without internet connectivity even in dire circumstances. This ability, including quirky transfer methods like ham radio, underscores Bitcoin’s independence from conventional infrastructure. Who needs Wi-Fi when you’ve got creativity?
Wall Street may dabble in Bitcoin markets. Institutions can buy, trade, and craft financial products around the cryptocurrency, but they can’t control the underlying supply. It’s like trying to herd cats-exasperating and futile.
Market Sentiment: A Cautious Dance
CryptosRus noted a shift in Bitcoin market dynamics, revealing that funding rates have lingered in negative territory for three consecutive days. This means short sellers are paying long position holders-a clear indicator of flushed leverage rather than euphoric sentiment. Sounds like a bad party where everyone’s left early!
NOBODY WANTS THIS TRADE 👀
Bitcoin funding rates have been negative for 3 straight days-shorts are paying longs!
That’s what happens when leverage gets flushed, not when the crowd is euphoric.
Momentum remains soft, and the CME gap near $84K hasn’t filled yet-but…
– CryptosRus (@CryptosR_Us)
According to analysis, momentum remains soft. A CME gap near $84,000 hasn’t been filled yet, but positioning seems cleaner than before. Sentiment has turned defensive, and long positions aren’t crowded anymore-much like a dance floor after the early birds have left.
The account suggests that improved risk-reward ratios often emerge when trader interest wanes. The current setup is like waiting for the right moment to strike before making any bold moves.
Community Divided on Wall Street’s Growing Shadow
The Bitcoin community finds itself in a spirited debate over institutional involvement. Supporters highlight the cryptocurrency’s voluntary participation model, asserting that off-grid transferability proves its resilience against centralized control. They sound like enthusiastic cheerleaders!
Skeptics, however, point to growing ETF inflows as ominous signs of emerging Wall Street influence. These competing perspectives reflect ongoing tensions within the crypto space, like two rival factions arguing over the best pizza topping. The debate revolves around whether institutional adoption bolsters or threatens Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos.
Long’s core argument maintains that ownership structure provides the ultimate protection. Unlike gold, Bitcoin cannot be physically corralled into bank vaults, preserving its defiant spirit against institutional dominance-regardless of how much Wall Street tries to join the party.
Read More
- When Bitcoin Mining Gets Tougher Than Your Math Teacher’s Homework 🤯
- PENGU’s Waddling Surge: Pudgy Penguins Hit $2B? 😂
- 🤑 Crypto Scams & AI: Steinbeck’s Guide to Not Getting Rug-Pulled 🤑
- Tokyo’s Top Man Blesses Digital Devilry! 😈💰
- Blockheads at UGM: Beans & Blockchain Edition 🌾
- When Wall Street Meets Bitcoin: A Tale of ETFs and Network Woes 😂
- 🤑 GAIN Token: Bull Trap or Divine Rebound? 🤑
- XRP to Moon or Bust? 🤡 Chart Nerds & Wishful Thinking Collide 🚀
- Bitcoin’s Speedy Upgrade: Can $HYPER Solve Bitcoin’s Slowness?
- Bitcoin’s Wild Surge: 3 Reasons Behind the $91K Miracle! 🚀
2026-02-03 15:54