Viral Iran-War Forecaster Professor Jiang Also Discussed Bitcoin

by

Professor Jiang, that sage from Beijing whose predictions about a U.S.-Iran war went viral (what else could one expect from such an insightful mind?), has also managed to stir up some excitement with his claims about Bitcoin.

Jiang Xueqin, a beacon of intellect in the world of academia, studied at Yale and now shares his wisdom through his “Predictive History” channel. His recent notoriety grew like wildfire after his forecast about an Iran conflict resurfaced amid ongoing tensions.

And now, behold-his new theory that Bitcoin isn’t some rebellious hacker’s little side project but, instead, the Pentagon’s well-crafted toy for surveillance and underground finance. Ah, how quaint! Could there be any better use of a decentralized currency than keeping tabs on all of us?

The US just attacked a desalination plant in Iran. But the entire gulf depends on those for drinking water

In Kuwait, 90% of all water comes from desalination plants

In Oman: 86%
In Saudi Arabia: 70%

Watch Professor Jiang explain why he’s predicting this helps Iran win ⬇️

– Zack Guzmán (@zGuz) March 7, 2026

From Iran Forecasts to Bitcoin Firestorm

Now, in one of his older videos, Jiang goes all in, declaring that Bitcoin is “a construct of the American military.” (You’ve got to love that touch of theatrical flair, right?)

He doesn’t stop there: “Bitcoin is designed as the ultimate surveillance technology,” he says. And if that doesn’t make you want to throw your hardware wallet in the nearest trash can, he goes ahead and labels it “the biggest scam out there.” Well, okay then!

Jiang’s case is built on four main pillars. First, he questions who could possibly have the resources, time, and know-how to create Bitcoin. An anonymous origin? Well, that’s clearly a smoking gun!

Next, he brings up DARPA’s contribution to the early internet-because if the U.S. military had a hand in the birth of something, well, it must’ve been for world domination, right?

Third, he points to Bitcoin’s transparent ledger, suggesting it’s basically Big Brother’s dream come true-tracking your every move like a financial GPS system.

Finally, he boldly claims that Bitcoin is the perfect instrument for the CIA to fund their covert operations. Ah, the plot thickens!

Where Professor Jiang’s Bitcoin Theory Lands

Some of Jiang’s points are, dare I say, based on historical facts. Yes, DARPA did play a role in developing the modern internet, so it’s not entirely a flight of fancy.

However, just because the military once helped build the internet doesn’t mean it’s behind Bitcoin. Let’s hold our horses before going full conspiracy mode.

The Bitcoin white paper was published by the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto back in 2008, describing a peer-to-peer system. No mention of Pentagon involvement, though. No public evidence, Jiang-sorry!

Jiang, of course, frames the entire debate with a question: “Who spent the resources and time to build a blockchain? Who is financing the servers? Who has expertise in technology?”

Let’s not get too excited, Jiang. Bitcoin is not private by default. It’s actually pretty transparent, which is why law enforcement has no problem tracing funds from wallet to wallet. Big Brother is watching… or is he?

The Winklevoss Argument Falls Short

As if things couldn’t get spicier, Jiang brings up the Winklevoss twins and their infamous Bitcoin investments. He suggests that their risky bet was evidence they knew what Bitcoin was “designed to do.”

He asks the burning question: “Who the hell spends every single cent on something on an investment?”

Well, Professor, the answer is simple: anyone with too much risk tolerance, or maybe a bit of conviction. But this doesn’t prove a U.S. government-backed conspiracy. Let’s keep it real.

Jiang’s argument is full of smoke and mirrors. Sure, he asks the right questions: Who benefits from a financial network that’s transparent? But then he jumps straight to conclusions without a shred of solid evidence. Classic.

Separating Fact From Opinion

Jiang has gone viral because of his eerie accuracy with that Iran forecast, but don’t mistake one lucky guess for a divine truth. Just because one of his predictions came true doesn’t mean everything else he says should be taken as gospel.

His Bitcoin theory is fun to chew on, but based on the evidence (or lack thereof), it’s better served as a conspiracy theory than as a concrete explanation of Bitcoin’s creation. But hey, who doesn’t love a good plot twist?

Read More

2026-03-10 04:03