Senators Flap Wings Over Crypto in Mortgages – Is This a Recipe for Disaster or Just Lunacy?

by

It seems that five esteemed members of the gloriously chaotic U.S. Senate, who also happen to be Democrats, have decided to engage in a little probe. And no, not the kind that involves spaceships and little green men—more like the kind that has them sticking their noses into the affairs of the nation’s housing finance agency. Their target? The illustrious head honcho, William Pulte, who is pondering whether or not the arcane mysteries of cryptocurrency should be taken into account when rubber-stamping mortgages. 🏠💰

Leading this brave expedition into the murky waters of digital coins is Senator Jeff Merkley, who on a fine Friday morning, dispatched a letter faster than you can say “I can’t believe it’s not butter,” requesting an outline of Pulte’s grand plans to assess the risks and benefits of allowing crypto to dance its way into the mortgage approval process.

And guess who else signed this epistolary masterpiece? Only the illustrious Elizabeth Warren, Chris Van Hollen, Mazie Hirono, and that perennial favorite, Bernie Sanders. They expect a reply by August 7th—which is rather generous, considering there are people still waiting for the answers to their college complaints from a decade ago.

Just last month, Pulte decreed that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, those two beloved quasi-governmental entities, should churn out a proposal on how to handle crypto assets in their risk assessments for single-family loans, all without having to convert the mystical digital coins into good ol’ U.S. dollars. Quite the conundrum, eh? 🤔

A rather cryptic cryptocurrency transaction

Senators raise alarm bells over crypto conundrums 🔔

Our brave senators are raising a furor, claiming that Pulte’s crypto plan could usher in unnecessary perils that may lay waste to hapless homebuyers and potentially rattle the very foundations of the U.S. housing market. Yikes! Can you imagine the chaos?

At present, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac operate under a policy that forbids lenders from taking crypto into account unless it’s first whisked away into the realm of U.S. dollars. Sensible, right? But the senators worry that borrowers dabbling in these unpredictable pixels might find themselves trapped—like a mouse in a cheese maze—unable to convert their dazzling digital wealth into cash when the interest payments come knocking at their door.

“Oh dear,” they lamented, “what of potential losses due to cyber hacks, or even the dreaded physical theft?” Which is awfully thoughtful, considering that even a questionable pizza delivery could leave a homeowner with far fewer assets—or at least, extraordinarily confused. 🍕

Democrats fear a cryptocurrency conundrum 📉

Continuing down the rabbit hole, the senators raised an eyebrow at the notion of conflicts of interest. They speculated whether Pulte would be fair and impartial in his decision-making, especially with the Trump family’s known proclivity for dallying in the crypto realm. The Trumps, it turns out, are knee-deep in every imaginable aspect of crypto—trading platforms, stablecoins, mining, you name it. They’re practically the royal family of the blockchain! 👑

To sweeten the pot, it seems Pulte’s partner is playing with up to $2 million in crypto. A modest fortune, one might think, which piques the senators’ interest even further. It’s like adding a sinister subplot to a sitcom, complete with ironic music. 🎶

The good senators pointed out what they considered an alarming conflict, noting that while he demands board approval from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for their recommendations, Pulte happens to sit atop both boards himself. It’s like asking your cat to babysit your dinner while simultaneously dining out. Food for thought!

Senators crave clarity like a thirsty traveler in the desert 🐪

The confusion deepened, and our intrepid senators demanded more clarity regarding Pulte’s vagueness—a term that seems all too familiar in political discourse. Without adequate oversight, they fear a repeat of the great banking crisis of 2023, which saw three banks collapse like poorly made souffle in a kitchen disaster movie.

They are also keen to point out that Fannie Mae had previously deemed crypto and stablecoins as the least thrilling application of blockchain technology—a sentiment not lost on those of us who still can’t figure out how to use our smartphones without causing a minor catastrophe.

So, what’s next for our senators? They’ve kindly asked Pulte to answer a laundry list of questions that would make even the most diligent accountant roll their eyes into the next county. Will he pull through with enlightening answers, or will this saga fade into the annals of political obscurity, much like last week’s salad? Stay tuned! 🌟

Read More

2025-07-28 09:47