A governance dispute at WLFI has led Justin Sun to accuse World Liberty Financial, a company supported by Donald Trump, of acting tyrannically. Sun claims the company uses forceful token lockups and operates with hidden ownership.
Summary
- Justin Sun calls WLFI’s latest governance proposal “one of the most absurd governance scams” he has seen, alleging coercive lockups and frozen voting power.
- The Trump‑backed World Liberty Financial is already under scrutiny for tying WLFI voting rights to 180‑day staking and for heavy concentration of voting power in a handful of wallets.
- WLFI’s token, once touted as a flagship DeFi asset, now trades around $0.08 with a market cap near $2.6 billion, as legal and governance disputes intensify.
As a crypto investor, I’m watching this situation with World Liberty Financial (WLFI) closely, and it’s getting pretty intense. Justin Sun is claiming the project’s governance is acting like a dictatorship, saying a new staking plan basically silences anyone who disagrees and gives all the power to anonymous entities. This is all happening while the token is trading around $0.08 – way down from its peak. It’s been a long-running feud between Sun and the team behind WLFI, which has ties to Trump, and honestly, it doesn’t look good for the project right now.
On April 15th, Tron founder Justin Sun strongly criticized a recent governance proposal from World Liberty Financial, calling it a step towards “world tyranny” rather than true financial freedom. He described it as a blatant scam and warned that the vote could jeopardize billions of dollars in assets and unfairly strip property rights from those who hold them. Sun was an early and significant supporter of the project, which has ties to Donald Trump.
这是”世界暴政”, 不是”世界自由金融”
此提案被包装成”治理对齐信号”和”长期承诺”，但剥开包装来看，这是我见过的最荒谬的治理骗局之一。我逐条说明。
一、反对即受罚——经典的胁迫手段…
— H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞 (@justinsuntron) April 15, 2026
World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency project previously linked to supporters of Donald Trump, has been criticized for proposals that require investors to lock up their available tokens for six months simply to keep their ability to vote on project decisions. A proposal from March suggested that voting power would be tied to long-term token holdings, offering a small annual return of around 2%, and introduced different levels of participation requiring very large investments – a system critics say favors those already in control and early, major investors.
Sun argues that WLFI’s latest proposal unfairly penalizes those who disagree with it. He claims that tokens belonging to voters who oppose the proposal are being locked up permanently, with no way to regain access. He believes this isn’t a fair vote, but rather a form of pressure. Sun also states that his own tokens, representing about 4% of the voting power, have been frozen, and that the WLFI team has the ability to control who can vote, effectively deciding the outcome before the vote even takes place.
Past reports suggest that decision-making within the WLFI system is heavily controlled by a small group. For example, one vote received overwhelming approval (99.12%), with most of the voting power (76%) held by just 10 wallets. This gives a limited number of token holders significant influence over the results. Furthermore, about 80% of the tokens initially sold remain locked and could be affected by future governance decisions, meaning any changes to when these tokens become available or are potentially removed from circulation could have a substantial impact.
Sun claims the WLFI smart contract is secretly controlled by a group of five anonymous individuals who must all agree on any changes. He also alleges that a hidden wallet can block users at any time, making community votes and discussions meaningless. Sun criticizes WLFI for requiring voters to prove their identities while those in control remain hidden, describing this as a form of disguised authoritarianism – “worse than tyranny” and a “dictatorship” pretending to be a decentralized organization.
The value of WLFI’s token has dropped over 70% from its highest point, currently trading around $0.08. Major exchanges show its market value at about $2.5 billion, with $80 million worth of tokens traded in the last day. The project initially raised over $460 million. According to Sun, the current vote is extremely important, as it will decide how and when tokens are released, who controls the project, and whether billions of tokens will be permanently removed from circulation – going much further than typical project updates.
Sun argues that the recent results are invalid and shouldn’t be considered official, encouraging WLFI token holders to publicly protest and protect their legal options. WLFI has defended its practices, claiming it only restricts activity it deems harmful or risky, and has indicated it’s prepared to resolve the disagreement through legal action. This suggests the conflict will likely be settled in court or through regulatory channels.
Read More
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Brent Oil Forecast
- Silver Rate Forecast
- USD BRL PREDICTION
- CNY JPY PREDICTION
- ETH PREDICTION. ETH cryptocurrency
- EUR INR PREDICTION
- Franklin Templeton’s Bold Leap into the Digital Age: Will it Pay Off?
- EUR MXN PREDICTION
- Banks Dump $100 Billion Into Blockchain—But Your Grandma Still Can’t Buy Groceries With It
2026-04-15 23:24