Fortune 411: Binance Just Trolled the Wall Street Journal-And Nobody Stopped Them

Picture this: a massive, slick exchange, sitting on its throne of silicon and spreadsheets, suddenly found itself the target of a blistering WSJ article suggesting it had shrugged off a $1.7 billion crypto spill involving Iran‑connected networks-right after Mr. Trump tossed the company’s founder a pardon like a second‑hand hosting sticker. Binance, ever the dispassionate digital ballerina, refused to take the choreography seriously. “We didn’t stop studying these flows,” they say, rolling their eyes behind the leveraged balance sheets. They claim to have continued the probe, cropp the suspect accounts, and sent a dotted‑line correction to the reporters before it hit the page.
Yet, in an almost Daffy‑Duck‑style blunder, the Wall Street Journal’s November 23 post ran a losing hand. The exchange, which last year had to pluck $4.3 billion out of its coffers (the kind of fine that makes tax auditors wish they were conventionally employed), is now picking up the legal scissors for a jury trial.
They label the piece as “misleading and damaging,” which, in the world of fiat‑fancy, translates roughly to “you shouldn’t post that unless you enjoy losing. If you didn’t, well, we’re here.”
In typical Sedaris energy, you could almost imagine Binance’s legal team exchanging high‑five emojis in an encrypted Slack channel, or the CEO-C: “We’re happy to solve mysteries. Not all of them involve government‑granted pardons.” Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal’s columnist could be sitting across the blotter, delightfully oblivious and shrugging with a coffee cup in hand, thinking, “Well, that was a cheap shot for the season.”

Read More

2026-03-11 18:07