It appears the venerable institution of SWIFT – a network one might describe as possessing all the dynamism of a particularly sedentary tortoise 𢠖 is deigning to dabble in the modern world of blockchain. They are, it is reported, engaged in a⦠*pilot program* with Linea, a platform concerning itself with a second layer upon the Ethereum construct. Over a dozen banks, including those stalwarts BNP Paribas and BNY Mellon, are participating. One almost feels a touch of pity for the poor coders tasked with fitting such grand institutions into such a novel framework.
SWIFT and Global Banks Begin Linea Blockchain Messaging Trial
A source, naturally speaking off the record lest they offend the financial gods, suggests this could be a ātechnological transformation.ā Oh, the audacity of hope! Several months, however, are predicted before any definitive clarity emerges. One suspects many a perfectly good spreadsheet will be filled with data before any actual transformation is observed.
SWIFT, you see, currently functions as a messenger, a sophisticated carrier pigeon if you will šļø, transmitting instructions for funds but not the funds themselves. Its current model relies on intermediaries and ālegacy railsā – a euphemism for systems clinging to life support. Critics, with a rather tiresome consistency, point to this complexity and delay. This pilot attempts to ascertain if Lineaās āzk-rollup architectureā – a mouthful, isnāt it? – can streamline matters whilst simultaneously appeasing the ever-watchful regulators.
This isn’t entirely new, of course. SWIFT has been tentatively poking the blockchain bear for some time, recently announcing rules for speedier cross-border payments, and planning trials of actual digital asset transmissions come 2025. Previous attempts involved UBS and Chainlink, successfully moving tokenized assets. One wonders if they’ve considered simply sending a strongly worded letter.
Linea, basking in the glow of its recently launched token and supporting a $72 billion digital finance ecosystem, portrays itself as a welcoming environment for banks preoccupied with compliance and⦠scalability. One imagines it offers very nice tea and biscuits with all its assurances.
In a panel discussion – naturally – SWIFT executives uttered words suggesting weāve moved beyond mere āexperiments.ā A profoundly insightful observation. Mr. Tom Zschach, a gentleman of evident intellect, posed the pertinent question of āscalingā and āwhere the value shows upā. A truly philosophical conundrum for the modern banker. š¤
Scaling Blockchain Messaging Faces Legal and Compliance Hurdles
Supporters trumpet enhanced efficiency, programmability, and transparency. But, as always, reality has a way of intruding. Integration costs, operational risks, and regulatory scrutiny loom large. And then, of course, there’s the small matter of legality.
Settlement is a legal construct, not a technical one. We need to align a blockchainās confirmation model with legal finality. Without that alignment, scaling will be difficult.
Tom Zschach, SWIFT
A statement so profound it practically demands to be framed. It underlines the necessity for standards, rulebooks, and, dare one say, a degree of common sense. Because recognizing on-chain settlement in a court of law requires⦠wait for it⦠a legal framework. Who could have predicted such a thing?
Whether full adoption will occur remains, shall we say, uncertain. This pilot, however, signals SWIFT’s intention to at least *appear* aligned with the evolving digital landscape. The outcome? Awaiting development⦠with a touch of cynical amusement. š§
Read More
- USD VES PREDICTION
- FIL PREDICTION. FIL cryptocurrency
- USD PLN PREDICTION
- EUR CNY PREDICTION
- JUP PREDICTION. JUP cryptocurrency
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- STETH PREDICTION. STETH cryptocurrency
- INJ PREDICTION. INJ cryptocurrency
- NEAR PREDICTION. NEAR cryptocurrency
- Brent Oil Forecast
2025-09-27 05:10