The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has backed Kalshi in its appeal against Ohio regulators, asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to affirm federal oversight of prediction markets.
Ohio’s argument is as flimsy as a crypto wallet during a bear market.)
The agency filed an amicus brief in KalshiEx LLC v. Matthew T. Schuler, et al., on May 12. The case centers on whether Ohio can treat Kalshi’s sports event contracts as unlicensed sports gambling. (Spoiler: Ohio, you’re not the boss of them.)
State authorities had told the company to stop offering those markets in Ohio. Kalshi sued, but a federal district court denied its request for protection in March. The company then appealed. (Plot twist: The legal system is exhausting.)
Selig says Ohio read CFTC power too narrowly
CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said the Ohio court took an “improperly narrow view” of the agency’s authority. He also said the CFTC would not allow “overzealous state governments” to weaken its role over these markets. (Translation: We’re not backing down, Ohio. Not today, Satan.)
Selig was sworn in as the 16th CFTC chairman on Dec. 22, 2025, after President Donald Trump nominated him and the Senate confirmed him. His comments show the agency’s current position: event contracts traded on CFTC-regulated exchanges should sit under federal derivatives law, not separate state gambling rules. (Because nothing says “fun” like regulatory bureaucracy.)
Meanwhile, the Ohio filing is part of a wider legal fight over prediction markets. The CFTC said it has already sued Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, New York and Wisconsin. It also secured court protection against state regulation of CFTC-regulated prediction markets in Arizona. (This is like a regulatory game of Whack-a-Mole, but with more contracts.)
Recent market updates show the dispute has moved beyond one company. Earlier reports said state actions have involved Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Robinhood and Coinbase. Some states argue these products look like betting, especially when they relate to sports outcomes. Platforms and the CFTC say the contracts are federally regulated derivatives. (Welcome to the wild west of finance, where “derivatives” and “gambling” fight for dominance like rival TikTok dances.)
Wider market stakes
Related crypto.news coverage said a Consensus Miami debate framed the issue as a clash between regulated financial contracts and state gambling law. Selig said those cases could reach the Supreme Court, while Kalshi’s sports contracts now account for most of its trading volume. (The Supreme Court: where even the most boring legal battles get a standing ovation.)
Separate coverage also noted that Kalshi won a key ruling against New Jersey, where a court backed federal oversight of its CFTC-supervised sports contracts. That case gave prediction market operators support, but the Ohio appeal shows the legal fight remains active across several courts. (It’s the regulatory equivalent of a reality show. Who’s going home this season? Stay tuned!)
Read More
- Gold Rate Forecast
- GBP USD PREDICTION
- USD BRL PREDICTION
- ETH PREDICTION. ETH cryptocurrency
- Silver Rate Forecast
- Brent Oil Forecast
- USD THB PREDICTION
- USD ILS PREDICTION
- TON PREDICTION. TON cryptocurrency
- USD ARS PREDICTION
2026-05-13 08:54