L1s Imploded in 2025… Except the Party Never Stopped? 😏

Behold, the Layer-1 tokens suffered a fate far more tragic than a bad date with a call centre-absolutely pulverized, yet somehow still attending the tea party of existence. Prices? Oh, they collapsed with the elegance of a poorly rehearsed Shakespearean tragedy. But was it truly the end, or merely a poorly timed costume change? 🤡

On the 25th of December, Schizoxbt delivered a treatise so bleak it could’ve been penned by a particularly tetchy economist at a dementia ward. Major Layer-1s? Severely underperforming! Even large-cap status, that fool’s golden ticket, couldn’t shield networks from the unflinching brutality of steep yearly drawdowns. 😂

Ethereum, that darling of decentralised sobriety, only endured a modest 15.3% slump. Solana, however, chose a villainous 35.9%. Avalanche and Sui? A breathtaking decline of 67.9% and 67.3%, respectively, as if they’d been kicked out of a blockchain-themed speakeasy. 💸

Ton, that tragic hero of the crypto stage, conceded a 73.8% loss, while BNB and TRX slyly posted gains of 18.2% and 9.8%. Profit! The bold ones danced even as the others wept. 🕺

A harsh lesson for investors: market cap alone is a lover who leaves when tempests blow. Even the most “blue-chip” tokens trembled beneath the market’s frostbitten gaze. Yet, amid the wreckage, what of the fundamentals? Did they, too, don ecclesiastical robes and flee towards the horizon? 🧱

Revenue and Fees: Did Network Monetization Really Weaken, or Simply Put on a More Dramatic Yawn?

While token prices drooped like wilted lilies in a hot British summer, on-chain revenue data painted a portrait of defiant prosperity. Token Terminal’s report revealed a cabal of Layer-1s clinging to activity with the stubbornness of a gossip columnist. 📊

Tron, that fiscal titan, led the charge with $3.5 B in annual revenue-a sum so vast it could fund a small aristocracy. Ethereum, modest and respectable, scraped together $305.3 M, while Solana, ever the showoff, claimed $206.8 M. 💸

Fees, too, gleamed with persistence. Solana, in a performance of quiet grandeur, topped the heap at $699.9 M, with Ethereum trailing at $549.3 M. This, while their prices languished in the wilderness of narrative decline. 🏆

BNB Chain? Ah, but it merely sipped tea at the grand ball of relevance, producing $260.3 M in fees. One might say that economic productivity is a far more reliable companion than token valuations. 🫖

User Activity: Were Traders Leaving Layer-1s, or Simply Occupying Reclining Chairs?

Monthly active addresses? A crowd so fervent it could’ve rivalled a celebrity’s Instagram comments section. Networks teemed with users, their transaction throughput a bacchanal of digital commerce. 🎉

BNB Chain led with 59.8 M active addresses-more than the entire population of a modest fairy-tale kingdom. Solana, with its 39.8 M, and NEAR Protocol’s 38.7 M, followed suit, while Sei Network boasted 10.6 M. Even Bitcoin, that grumpy old salt, roused 10.3 M. 🧙

Ethereum, trailing at 9.3 M, offered a lesson in steady progress over frantic sprinting. The numbers whispered: participation endured, even as prices threw themselves into the abyss of correction. 📉

Fundamentals vs. Price Action: A Dance of Hare and Hare?

2025’s defining theme? The dissonant waltz between plummeting prices and unyielding fundamentals. Layer-1 tokens, it seemed, were not structurally collapsing but merely repricing their moment in the sun. ☀️

The October sell-off, a final hurrah before winter, accelerated the slide. Yet capital and activity coalesced into a tight-knit cabal of productive chains. Speculative premiums? Sent packing. Economically viable networks? Invited to tea. ☕

Final Thoughts: A Summary Too Tardy for Oscar Wilde

  • The 2025 drawdown left Layer-1s bruised, but not dead-more like a tragicomedy without a punchline. 😅
  • On-chain metrics suggested a sector gasping for air… or merely comedy of errors. 🤯

Read More

2025-12-26 07:09