NFTs & AI: A Legal Tango with More Drama Than a Soap Opera! 🎭

by

Law and Ledger-because nothing says “thrilling” like crypto legal news, darling-is brought to you by Kelman Law, the fine folks who’ve decided that digital assets need more paperwork than a royal wedding. đź‘‘

The following opinion editorial was penned (or perhaps algorithmically generated-who knows these days?) by Alex Forehand and Michael Handelsman for Kelman.Law. Proceed with caution, or at least a stiff drink. 🍸

NFTs, Intellectual Property, and the Legal Circus of AI-Generated Nonsense

As NFTs continue their metamorphosis from overpriced JPEGs to-*gasp*-actual tools for commerce, the legal world is scrambling to keep up like a butler chasing a runaway champagne cork. And just when you thought it couldn’t get more absurd, along comes generative AI, throwing copyright law into a blender and hitting “frappĂ©.” 🎨🤖

Copyright and NFTs: A Love-Hate Relationship

Let’s get one thing straight, darling: buying an NFT doesn’t mean you own the art. It’s like buying a ticket to the opera-you don’t get to take home the soprano. The U.S. Copyright Office has made this abundantly clear, bless their bureaucratic hearts. Unless the smart contract spells it out in triplicate, you’re basically paying for bragging rights and a digital receipt. How très moderne.

And don’t even get us started on Hermès International v. Rothschild, where the court kindly reminded everyone that slapping a blockchain under a Birkin bag knockoff doesn’t make it legal. Somewhere, a trademark lawyer is sipping champagne and cackling. 👜⚖️

AI-Generated Works: Who’s the Artist-You or Your Toaster?

Ah, generative AI-the ultimate “my dog ate my homework” for the digital age. The U.S. Copyright Office has declared that if a work isn’t created by a human, it’s about as copyrightable as a sneeze. So, if your NFT was dreamed up by an algorithm while you were binge-watching Succession, congratulations: you’ve made modern art. But you might not own it. 🎭

In a delightful twist, a court recently upheld the Copyright Office’s stance, ruling that “human authorship is a bedrock requirement.” Translation: if your AI is the Picasso, you’re just the gallery owner. And galleries don’t get copyrights. Tough break, darling. 🖼️

So, before you mint that AI-generated masterpiece, consider:

  • Licensing frameworks: Because nothing says “romance” like a 50-page terms-of-service agreement.
  • Human Authorship: Pretend you did something. Scribble on a napkin if you must.
  • Attribution mechanisms: Transparency! Or, as we call it, “covering your derrière.”
  • Contractual safeguards: Because trust is for suckers and blockchain is… well, blockchain.

Smart Contracts and Royalty Enforcement: The Broken Promise

Remember when NFTs were supposed to automate royalties? So quaint. Now, marketplaces let buyers opt out like guests dodging the host’s terrible canapés. Courts can still enforce contracts, but let’s be honest-nobody wants to litigate over a cartoon ape. 🦍💸

Practical Tips for the Brave (or Foolhardy)

If you’re still determined to wade into this legal swamp, here’s how to do it with style:

  1. Clear Licensing – Spell it out like you’re explaining blockchain to your grandmother.
  2. Trademark Awareness – Don’t let your AI generate Mickey Mouse in a thong. Just don’t.
  3. Human Authorship Documentation – Keep receipts. And maybe a notary.
  4. Dispute Resolution Mechanisms – Because lawsuits are so last season.

Final Curtain Call

The intersection of NFTs, IP law, and AI is a glorious mess-like a cocktail party where no one knows the host. But with careful licensing, a dash of human effort, and a healthy dose of paranoia, you might just survive it. Or at least have a good story for the tabloids. đź“°

Kelman PLLC is here to help, because someone has to clean up this digital Wild West. For a consultation (or just a sympathetic ear), contact them. Or pour yourself another drink. We won’t judge. 🥂

Original article here, because plagiarism is so gauche.

Read More

2025-09-04 09:01