A Dramatic Showdown: Cardano Foundation Parries Hoskinson’s Jabs with Wit and Wisdom!

by

Cardano Foundation Stands Firm

At the very heart of this melodrama lies the claim that the Foundation’s most significant efforts are as invisible to the end user as a well-mannered ghost at a soirée. “The Cardano Foundation plays a critical ongoing role in maintaining key components, much like a polite butler ensuring the silverware shines for the dignitaries,” the post rather grandly declares.

It continues down its fanciful path, noting the commendable services such as GraphQL-delightfully concocted by IOG atop DB-Sync-a high-performance Java implementation of Rosetta, and the pièce de résistance, the Token Registry. Oh! What a splendid buffet of achievements!

The Foundation maintains that it “hosts a Token Registry API accessible to the public,” and that its various teams have been toiling like diligent ants since 2021 to make sure that ADA and native-token onboarding is less like a Herculean labor and more akin to a gentle waltz.

Ah, but the drama thickens! When it comes to who should be footing the bill for new listings and token integrations, the Foundation resolutely refuses to play favorites. “To fund bespoke Cardano Native Token integrations would be akin to tossing a coin in a fountain and declaring one wish worthy of reality while damning another,” it asserts, gracefully avoiding the entanglement of favoritism in this “diverse and complex ecosystem.”

This audacious statement does little to diminish the Foundation’s self-appointed role in the noble arena of on-chain governance, a title it wears proudly since the launch of constitutional governance this year. Like a polished actor on a grand stage, it presents itself as both an Intersect Constitutional Committee (ICC) member and a DRep, claiming a live stake “of nearly ₳233 million” across “331 delegators.” Oh, how the numbers shimmer!

It graciously acknowledges concerns regarding stakeholder concentration, conceding that “₳140 million” from its inception has been delegated to a selection of community-builder DReps, presumably handpicked for their astonishing talents in the delicate art of governance.

The Foundation’s repertoire includes not just the mundane but the truly captivating-educational resources, a DRep voting tool, governance flowcharts, and the co-coordination of hard-fork processes. One can almost hear the applause as it strives to “enable the community to engage easily and meaningfully in on-chain decision-making.”

In a laughably ironic twist, the Foundation revisits the 2021 overhaul of its board-an act that seems to haunt Hoskinson’s every critique. After a “somewhat dysfunctional” act, Switzerland’s foundation supervisor summoned an external law firm, the trusty guide to lead the Cardano Foundation into the proverbial calm waters.

The Theatrical Backstory

Ah, what impeccable timing! On August 22, Hoskinson took to the stage with a surprise AMA, raising the stakes of his long-standing rivalry with the Foundation, this time with an acute focus on Midnight’s NIGHT token distribution. “We built it. It’s my money. We can do whatever the hell we want,” he proclaimed, fashionably framing the matter as a necessary risk-control measure to avoid burdening the illustrious network with undue harm.

In classic dramatic fashion, he accused the Foundation of missing the proverbial boat and failing to provide effective support. Yet, this kerfuffle holds deeper roots. Just last year, he suggested relocating the Foundation to a place more amiable to the notion of community-elected board members, criticizing Switzerland’s supervisory framework for its constraints on accountability. To which one can only imagine the French aristocracy’s reactions!

Moreover, he raised the specter of the Foundation’s alleged heavy-handedness in constitutional drafting, a claim that the Foundation has parried with a charming array of narratives and disclosures, akin to a skilled fencer in a duel. If the Foundation sought to calm these turbulent waters, it appears the tides have yet to settle, as community members clamor for clarity.

One member of the audience inquired about the possibility of board elections that could change the current members, questioning whether “the Swiss still hold sway.” Another poetically demanded a roadmap toward community-driven board elections, alleging that the present composition fails to reflect the community’s lofty ambitions, a lament worthy of the finest literature.

As the curtain draws, the price of ADA hovers around $0.86, casting a shadow over this theatrical performance.

Read More

2025-08-28 01:25